Question

23
（2010·浙江椒江育英學校高三上第一次月考）
今年2月6日，教育部對“高中是否該文理分科”征求民意。為此，某媒體做了一次民意調查，調查結果如圖表所示。
 

支持者	反對者	你的觀點
減輕課業(yè)負擔； 現(xiàn)代社會需要專門人才	人才培養(yǎng)的必由之路； 可以培養(yǎng)復合型人才	……

請你結合圖表所示內容，用英語寫一篇題為”Should Science and Arts Education Be Separated?” 的短文，談一下你的看法，以便刊登在某一英文報刊上。
要求：
觀點明確，理由充分。
不要逐句翻譯。
詞數(shù)120左右（開頭已經(jīng)給出，不計入總詞數(shù)）。
復合型 multi-skilled
Should Science and Arts Education Be Separated?
The issue of separating science and arts education is getting heated up as debate spreads through the country, which attracts tens of thousands of votes.

Answer 1

  
One possible  version：
Should Science and Arts Education Be Separated?
The issue of separating science and arts education is getting heated up as debate spreads through the country, which attracts tens of thousands of votes.
About 50% of the people interviewed think it unwise to get science and arts separated in high school. In their opinion, a real expert needs a wide range of knowledge. With the development of modern society, multi-skilled people are in great demand. However, over 40 % of them insist that science and arts should be separated so that students can concentrate on some subjects and become experts. Besides, they will not be overburdened as before.
As far as I’m concerned, a comprehensive education is better than a separated one. A strong ability in both science and arts is helpful for the long-term development of individuals and the society as a whole. Worldwide, only in China science and arts are separated, which has had a bad effect on students’ sound development. It’s high time we changed this model. I don't think comprehensive education will put a heavy burden on the students.

解析