Question

閱讀下面的短文，然后按照要求寫一篇150詞左右的英語短文。
A former high school teacher who fled his classroom during the massive May 12 earthquake in southwest China has a new job here in a private training school.
Fan Meizhong has a two-year contract with Keyfind Education School in the Haidian District, school spokesman Zhang Wenbin told Xinhua on Wednesday.
The former Chinese language teacher from a private high school in earthquake-hit Dujiangyan City, Sichuan Province, was nicknamed “running Fan” by netizens （網(wǎng)民） after he left his students behind and escaped the classroom as the 8.0-magnitude earthquake struck.
Fan’s behavior became a controversial object, and he was later fired.
Zhang said, however, that Fan had been hired for his extensive teaching experience and talent. At Keyfind, he’ll conduct research on developing students’ potential and raising their interest in learning. He’ll also give some lectures, according to Zhang.
“Fan, as a person, also needs to live,” Zhang said. “We hope the media will be tolerant about Fan and give him some living space. Whether he was wrong or right in his running behavior, we only want to make use of his talent.”
He said the school had not decided what to do next about Fan’s job.
【寫作內(nèi)容】
1. 以約30個詞概括短文的要點；
2. 然后以約120個詞就“范美忠再被聘為教師”為主題發(fā)表你的看法，并包括下列要點：
你是怎樣看待范美忠在發(fā)生地震時的先跑行為的；
范美忠該不該再聘為教師，為什么？
你心目中的教師該是怎么樣的？
【寫作要求】
1．作文中可使用實例或其他論述方法支持你的觀點，也可以參照閱讀材料的內(nèi)容,
但不得直接引用原文中的句子；
2．作文中不能出現(xiàn)真實姓名和學校名稱。
【評分標準】概括準確，語言規(guī)范，內(nèi)容合適，篇章連貫。

Answer 1

 
( Possible version 1 )
The passage is mainly about the news that Fan Meizhong, once a teacher in Dujiangyan City who left his students behind and ran away during the earthquake, again got employed as a teacher in Beijing.
In my opinion, Fan's behavior deserves scolding. According to our law's morality, any grown-up should have the duty to protect teenagers. Therefore, as a teacher, Fan should have helped his helpless students during the earthquake instead of choosing to run away. Although we can understand that it is the instinct that makes Fan escape from the earthquake, he shouldn’t insist that he was a model to be followed. It’s really a shame.
As a result, I think he is not qualified as a teacher anyway, though we should be a little tolerant to give him a chance. If employed as a teacher, he shall set a bad pattern for others.
In my eyes, a teacher should not only be rich in knowledge but also have noble virtue. 

項目	分值	評分標準
概 括	5	按照要求概括了原文的全部主要信息，沒有增加與原文無關的信息，沒有照抄原文的句子。語言結構正確，行文規(guī)范。
	4	基本按照要求概括了原文的主要信息，沒有增加與原文無關的信息，沒有照抄原文的句子。語言結構正確，行文規(guī)范。
	3	基本按照要求概括了原文的主要信息，但包含一些不相關的信息，有個別句子抄自原文。語言結構基本正確，行文比較規(guī)范。
	2	不能按照要求概括原文的主要信息，包含較多不相關的信息，有較多的抄襲。語言結構不夠準確，行文不夠規(guī)范。
	0-1	沒有按照要求概括原文的主要信息，基本是不相關的信息，大多數(shù)句子都抄自原文。語言結構不準確，行文不規(guī)范。
寫 作	18-20	包含題目所給全部或絕大部分的內(nèi)容要點。主題明確，內(nèi)容豐富。 詞匯豐富，用詞得當。能有效運用合適的語言結構，而且沒有（或極少）語法錯誤。 篇章結構的連貫性好。
	14-17	包含題目所給全部或絕大部分的內(nèi)容要點。主題明確，個別內(nèi)容不準確或者不相關。 詞匯較豐富，有個別用詞錯誤。較好地運用了合適的語言結構，有少許的語法錯誤。 篇章結構的連貫性較好。
	11-13	包含題目所給全部或絕大部分的內(nèi)容要點。主題比較明確，個別內(nèi)容不準確或者不相關。 詞匯較豐富，有個別用詞錯誤。較好地運用了合適的語言結構，有少許的語法錯誤。 篇章結構的連貫性較好。
	7-10	包含題目所給的部分內(nèi)容要點。主題基本明確，有些內(nèi)容不準確或者不相關。 詞匯有限，有較多的用詞錯誤。語言結構出現(xiàn)較多的語法錯誤。 篇章結構的連貫性一般。
	4-6	只包含題目所給的個別內(nèi)容要點。多數(shù)內(nèi)容不相關或者不準確。文章有些地方照抄源文。 詞匯貧乏，有較多的用詞錯誤。大多數(shù)的句子出現(xiàn)語法錯誤。 篇章結構的連貫性差。
	1-3	只包含與題目所給要點內(nèi)容有關的一些單詞。主題不明確，文章基本照抄原文。 詞匯極其貧乏，基本不能正確用詞。幾乎沒有正確的句子。篇章結構零亂。
	0	以下幾種情況，給0分： 1）完全抄襲原文（或其它文章） 2）文不對題 3）只寫一些零散的單詞，完全沒有表達完整的內(nèi)容