Question

最近網(wǎng)上正在開展是否取消高中文理分科的討論，人們的觀點(diǎn)基本分成針鋒相對(duì)的兩派：支持者認(rèn)為取消文理分科有助于提高學(xué)生整體素質(zhì)，使學(xué)生更加適應(yīng)新的時(shí)代要求。反對(duì)者認(rèn)為文理分科有利于減輕學(xué)生負(fù)擔(dān)，有利于對(duì)專門人才的選拔。請(qǐng)你用英語為某中學(xué)生英文報(bào)寫一篇報(bào)道，介紹一下討論的情況并發(fā)表自己的看法。

注意：

1. 首句已給出，不計(jì)人總詞數(shù)；

2. 詞數(shù)：120—150詞。

參考詞匯:liberal art class文科班    science class 理科班   all-round abilities整體素質(zhì)

Recently readers have had a heated discussion about whether it's necessary to cancel the division of liberal art classes and science classes in senior middle schools.

Answer 1

One possible version:

Recently there is a heated discussion about whether it’s necessary to cancel the division of liberal are classes and science classes in senior middle schools on the Internet.

Some people are for the cancellation. They think both liberal arts and science are worth learning, because they develop our all-round abilities, which is essential in modern society. Besides, students can also master two different ways of thinking by balancing the two, and that is to benefit a lot in their future lives. However, some people are against the idea. They believe that if there is no division, students will have to learn too many subjects, which is sure to increases their burden. What’s more, many students are good at specific fields, but poor at some subjects, so cancelling the division will exclude them from entering universities.

In my opinion, the fewer subjects we have, the more we can focus on what we learn. The division can lighten our burden and makes us better at what we are interested in.