Question

6．Should parents ever hit their children？
Research suggests many of us are likely to respond"no"，and public support for spanking（打屁股） has been falling over the years．But surveys also show that 75 percent to nearly 90 percent of parents admit to spanking their child at least once．
I was raised in a zero-tolerance home for disrespect，and my parents often turned to physical punishment．And，no，I don't feel I was damaged by it．
Nothing is more annoying than watching ill-mannered behavior from children．
But there is data to suggest that a return to old-school spanking isn't the answer．
Two years ago，Newsweek reported that it had found data suggesting that teens whose parents used physical punishment were more likely to become aggressive．
Murray Straus，professor at the University of New Hampshire in America，has studied the topic of children and spanking for decades．He said that children who were physically punished have lower IQs than their peers．It may be that children with lower IQs were more likely to get spanked，but the punishment may have been counterproductive （反作用的） to their mental development，as well．
Some researchers make the argument that occasional open-handed smacks （用巴掌打） on the bottom are not only harmless but can have some benefit．
Last year，Marjorie Gunnoe，a psychologist at Calvin College，studied teens who have never spanked．There are a greater number of children growing up without ever having been physically punished．Gunnoe） s research suggests they don't turn out any better than those who were sometimes spank．
There are some parents who simply cannot control their tempers （脾氣）．But I still believe that the best parents are the ones who are able to offer fair and firm discipline without ever turning to physical punishment．
45．According to the first three paragraphs，the author was probably hit by her parents whenB．
A．they were dissatisfied with her grade
B．she showed no respect for the elder
C．they cannot control their temper
D．their discipline turns out to be not strict enough
46．According to Murray Straus，children who are physically punishedD．
A．a(chǎn)re less aggressive toward others when they get older
B．have slower physical development
C．benefit from occasional spanking
D．may develop lower IQs than their peer
47．Which of the following statements is TRUE according to the article？D
A．40 percent of children grow up without ever being spanked
B．Children who suffer less physical punishment are better students
C．Occasional open-handed spanking on the bottom are mentally harmful
D．Researchers disagree over whether smacking is mentally harmful to children
48．The author seems to agree thatC．
A．parents should determine whether a child needs to be smacked or not
B．children who have been spanked tend to behave better than those who haven't
C．good parents discipline their children in a fair and reasonable way
D．physical punishment should be the last resort of any parent．

Answer 1

分析 文章講述了父母要不要體罰孩子的問題．大部分父母都打過孩子的屁股，孩子有一些不好的行為時，父母往往都會體罰．研究者發(fā)現(xiàn)，體罰孩子會影響孩子的智商．好的父母會給孩子一個公平而且不變的原則，讓孩子有規(guī)矩可以遵守．

解答 答案：45．B 細(xì)節(jié)理解題．文章第一段說I was raised in a zero-tolerance home for disrespect，and my parents often turned to physical punishment如果不尊重人父母就會體罰我．故選B．
46．D 細(xì)節(jié)理解題．文章第五段說He said that children who were physically punished have lower IQs than their peers被體罰的孩子智商要比同齡人低．故選D．
47．D 細(xì)節(jié)判斷題．文章第六段說Some researchers make the argument that occasional open-handed smacks（用巴掌打）on the bottom are not only harmless but can have some benefit研究者討論了用巴掌打屁股不僅僅只有害處也有好處．故選D．
48．C 細(xì)節(jié)理解題．文章最后說But I still believe that the best parents are the ones who are able to offer fair and firm discipline without ever turning to physical punishment最好的父母應(yīng)該給孩子一個公平而且固定的原則而不是體罰．故選C．

點評 閱讀理解是考查語篇理解能力．�？嫉念}型有：推理判斷題；主旨大意題；細(xì)節(jié)理解題；猜測詞意題．近幾年又出現(xiàn)了兩種新的考查方式：寫作態(tài)度判斷題和文章結(jié)構(gòu)題．解題時，在讀懂文章的基礎(chǔ)上，還有特別注意掌握題型的特征，尤其是細(xì)節(jié)題和推斷題不可混淆：細(xì)節(jié)題是文章信息的再現(xiàn)；推斷題是文章信息的提�。�本題是廣告類文章，考查主要是以細(xì)節(jié)題為主，細(xì)節(jié)題要注意常用的出題陷阱有：夸大，縮小，張冠李戴，偷梁換柱，無中生有等，做題時要看清看準(zhǔn)．