Question

4．How did it make you feel when you learned that KFC'S Beijing restaurants pulled three more items from their menus last week？There were fears that the items may have contained the cancer-causing coloring Sudan I．Do you have any desire to take the food provider to court because it feeds you something dangerous？
 After all，the law supposedly gives people the right to fight for their rights．But some experts have said it might not be so wise to take the company directly to court．
 Qiu Baochang，a lawyer in Beijing，suggested that consumers not take the company directly to court．"In addition to the high costs，consumers'complaints are unlikely to win unless they can prove they have had the banned dye （染料） at KFC，"-Qiu explained．
 One problem for those wanting to take action against the fast food chain is that few customers ask for or keep receipts（收據(jù)）．And，this must be the first step．
 If they can prove that their health has been damaged by KFC，they can accuse the company．But that would be almost impossible to do so because the Sudan I damage is a long-term effect and is not immediately apparent．
A KFC spokesperson said on Monday that the company was confident of being able to handle customers'complaints，"We will obey legal procedure if we receive any complaints．"
24．Why did KFC's Beijing restaurants pull three more items from their menus？B
A．Because the company was afraid to handle customers'complaints．
B．Because coloring Sudan I may have been contained in those items．
C．Because the KFC's restaurants were accused of selling poisonous food to the customers．
D．Because these items were no longer popular with the customers．
25．The reason why experts suggested not taking the company directly to court is thatD．
A．the costs will be high
B．consumers can't prove food contained Sudan I
C．consumers can't prove the food at KFC damaged their health
D．a(chǎn)ll of the above
26．This passage most probably appears inD．
A．a(chǎn) notice．
B．a(chǎn) book on cooking．
C．a(chǎn) story book．
D．a(chǎn) newspaper．
27．What is the general idea of the passage？A
A．That KFC's Beijing restaurants pulled three items from their menus last week．
B．How the consumers dealt with the KFC problem．
C．How KFC handled the customers'complaints．
D．That consumers never forget to ask for or keep receipts．

Answer 1

分析 本文講述了快餐巨頭KFC撤回可能含有致癌物質(zhì)Sudan I 菜品的事，針對(duì)消費(fèi)者受到的可能傷害，專家也給出了一定的建議，而KFC的相關(guān)人員也給出了明確的回應(yīng)，會(huì)妥善處理顧客提出的投訴．

解答 24．B 細(xì)節(jié)理解題．根據(jù)文章第一段的第二句There were fears that the items may have contained the cancer-causing coloring Sudan I，答案為B，由于怕包含某項(xiàng)致癌物質(zhì)．
25．D 綜合理解題．根據(jù)以下語(yǔ)句In addition to the high costs，consumers'complaints are unlikely to win unless they can prove they have had the banned dye （染料） at KFC花費(fèi)高，且必須拿出證據(jù)； If they can prove that their health has been damaged by KFC，they can accuse the company．But that would be almost impossible to do so because the Sudan I damage is a long-term effect and is not immediately apparent．不能證明該物質(zhì)損害了身體，綜上所述，答案D能概括不直接發(fā)起起訴的原因．
26．D 推理判斷題．該文章說的食品安全問題，這是一個(gè)重要的話題，一般出現(xiàn)在報(bào)紙中進(jìn)行報(bào)道，A、B、C三處均不符合實(shí)際，故D為正確選項(xiàng)．
27．A 主旨?xì)w納題．文章開篇就提到KFC的撤回現(xiàn)有菜品的問題，而后圍繞其進(jìn)行了報(bào)道，故A能概括文章大意．

點(diǎn)評(píng) 本文是社會(huì)文化類閱讀理解．做這類題材閱讀理解時(shí)要求考生對(duì)文章通讀一遍，做題時(shí)結(jié)合原文和題目有針對(duì)性的找出相關(guān)語(yǔ)句進(jìn)行仔細(xì)分析，結(jié)合選項(xiàng)選出正確答案．推理判斷題也是要在抓住關(guān)鍵句子的基礎(chǔ)上合理的分析才能得出正確答案，切忌胡亂猜測(cè)，一定要做到有理有據(jù)．